Impeachment News Not Fit for NY Times

Did you hear that Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) brought articles of impeachment against Vice President Dick Cheney to the House floor on Tuesday of last week10? The nation’s leading paper, The New York Times didn’t carry the story, and it may well be that your local newspaper also didn’t have it11x20. The Washington Post, with the federal government as its local beat, did run a piece on the event, but it was a cutesy comment column (“Kucinich’s Battle Against Cheney Not So (Im)Peachy Keen”) that mocked the impeachment move and the man who brought it12. Shouldn’t the first formal impeachment move from the new Democratic-majority Congress merit a serious story on the front page of the nation’s newspapers? On the evening following the event, you could find a fair, informative article on some Internet news sites – for instance, The Raw Story, CQ Politics, CNN and Fox News13x14x15x16. As for network and cable TV, I don’t know if their regular newscasts covered the story, but CNN’s Wolf Blitzer did interview Kucinich on the matter that evening during his daily news show17. At any rate, Kucinich’s impeachment measure contains three articles:

  • I. That Cheney “purposely manipulated the intelligence process to deceive the citizens and Congress of the United States by fabricating a threat of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction to justify the use of the United States Armed Forces against the nation of Iraq in a manner damaging to our national security interests.”
  • II. That Cheney “purposely manipulated the intelligence process to deceive the citizens and Congress of the United States about an alleged relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda in order to justify the use of the U.S. Armed Forces against the nation of Iraq in a manner damaging to our national security interests.”
  • III. That Cheney violated Article VI of the Constitution that “all treaties made … under the authority of the United States shall be the supreme law of the land”, in that he “has openly threatened aggression against the Republic of Iran absent any real threat to the United States, and done so with the United States’ proven capability to carry out such threats, thus undermining the national security of the United States.”

Kucinich supports these claims with 15 or 16 documents for each article. He said it was important to take this action now to stop Cheney from starting a war against Iran18. Asked about impeaching Bush, Kucinich said that impeaching Cheney first was the responsible way, because the other way Cheney would become President, and it would be agonizing for the nation to impeach two presidents, one after the other. Kucinich also gave a basic reason for the impeachment move:

It’s not appropriate for the government to lie to people. It is wrong for government officials — you know, the vice president, in this case — to take this nation into war based on lies.

And so, again, this becomes a question of who we are as a people. And so this resolution 333, articles of impeachment against the vice president, will let future generations know that no one is above the law of this country and that Congresses have the specific responsibility to provide a check to administrative abuse of power. That’s the way the framers set this government up.

The impeachment move gained strength later in the week when two congressmen, William Lacy Clay (D-MO) and Janice Schakowsky (D-IL), signed up to sponsor Kucinich’s resolution19.

Poll

Results of The Paragraph‘s online poll taken between May 3rd and June 30th:

How did you learn that Rep. Kucinich brought impeachment charges against V.P. Cheney?

Votes Percent
The Paragraph (this post) 5 18%
Other Internet News 13 46%
TV News 3 11%
Radio News 0 0%
Newspaper 1 4%
News Magazine 0 0%
Word of Mouth 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Total 28 100%

Sources

10 ‘House Resolution 333 Impeaching Richard B. Cheney’ – pdf / Supporting Documentation

11 A search of NY Times archives shows one article for the three days, starting with April 24, the date of the impeachment resolution. That article, written by the Associated Press, was about Kucinich’s plan to bring the impeachment resolution, and was published before he introduced it.

12 ‘Kucinich’s Battle Against Cheney Not So (Im)Peachy Keen’ By Dana Milbank, The Washington Post, Wednesday, April 25, 2007

13 ‘Kucinich announces impeachment charges against Vice President Cheney’ by Michael Roston, The Raw Story, Tuesday April 24, 2007

14 ‘Kucinich’s Impeachment Proposal Takes Antiwar Stand to New Lengths’ By Marie Horrigan, CQ Politics.com, Apr. 24, 2007

15 ‘Kucinich takes steps to impeach Cheney’, Lauren Kornreich, CNN, Tuesday, April 24, 2007

16 ‘Congressman Kucinich Introduces Impeachment Articles Against Dick Cheney’ by Jim Mills and Molly Hooper, Fox News, Tuesday, April 24, 2007

17 CNN Transcripts – THE SITUATION ROOM’ Aired April 24, 2007 – 1900 ET

18 ‘Transcript of Kucinich Press Conference’ 2007-04-24

19 BREAKING: 3 US Reps Support Cheney Impeachment’ By Matthew Cardinale, News Editor, Atlanta Progressive News, April 29, 2007

20 ‘Mainstream American Journalism is Dead’ – AfterDowningStreet.org, 2007-04-29

… consider Rep. Dennis Kucinich’s filing, last Tuesday, of a bill of impeachment against Dick Cheney in the House of Representatives. Clearly a historic event—the first concrete step towards impeachment in the House in the new Democratic-led Congress—the bill, which charges Cheney with lying about Iraq having WMDs, lying about a non-existent link between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda, and illegally threatening Iran with an invasion (a crime under international, and US, law), went unreported in the New York Times, supposedly the nation’s “newspaper of record.” As for the Washington Post, the next day all it had was a sophomoric, pissy column by Dana Milbank, which spent most of its time belittling Kucinich’s short stature and bad hairstyle. The nationwide demonstrations calling for impeachment held in over 150 different cities across the country on Saturday went unmentioned in Sunday’s New York Times, though there was an article in the Washington Post about the event at the Washington Monument in the paper’s own city (it failed to mention that events were going on elsewhere too.)

* * * By Quinn Hungeski – Posted at G.N.N. & TheParagraph.com

2 comments for “Impeachment News Not Fit for NY Times

  1. May 21, 2007 at 9:19 pm

    Excellent comprehensive coverage!

    Thanks for posting all of this up.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Comments MUST be civil. Your first comment will be held for moderation, and will likely appear within 12 hours. Required fields are marked with *.

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield