<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Paragraph &#187; Astronomy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theparagraph.com/category/minor/astronomy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theparagraph.com</link>
	<description>Terse news, history and science.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 21:16:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Comet Holmes Still Visible</title>
		<link>http://theparagraph.com/2007/12/comet-holmes-still-visible/</link>
		<comments>http://theparagraph.com/2007/12/comet-holmes-still-visible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 04:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Quinn Hungeski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autumn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[binoculars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cassiopeia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comet Holmes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edwin Holmes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lake Erie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milky Way]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outburst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perseus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pleiades]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theparagraph.com/2007/12/comet-holmes-still-visible/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	2007-12-07: I saw Comet Holmes again the night before last, one of the few clear nights during this cloudy late autumn near Erie&#8217;s southern shore.  Being far enough from city lights to see the milk of the Milky Way, I could just make out the comet by naked eye.  But through binoculars, I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>2007-12-07: I saw Comet Holmes again the night before last, one of the few clear nights during this cloudy late autumn near Erie&#8217;s southern shore.  Being far enough from city lights to see the milk of the Milky Way, I could just make out the comet by naked eye.  But through binoculars, I saw a striking, round smudge of light that seems about the size of the moon, but saw no sign of a tail.  Comet Holmes is usually far too faint to see, but on October 24th, it underwent an outburst, and in a day became brighter than most of its neighboring stars in Perseus.x<sup class="footnote"><a href="#fn14563281154c5231d81deb8">50</a></sup>  Since then, it has been growing and fading.  Astronomer Edwin Holmes first found Comet Holmes when it underwent an outburst in November 1892.  Two-and-a-half months later, it popped again.  In its 16 trips around the sun since, it has stayed dark, until this year.x<sup class="footnote"><a href="#fn20609070384c5231d81df03">51</a></sup>  I did not hear about Comet Holmes until latter November, and missed it at its brightest.  The comet now appears half-way along a line from the left-end of the &#8220;W&#8221; in Cassiopeia and the little diamond necklace that is the Pleiades.  With binoculars and a view of Perseus, I think you could see it even from the city.  And if it follows its behavior of a hundred years ago, Comet Holmes would brighten for us again in early January.</p>

	<p><strong>Update:</strong> 2007-12-12 &#8211; There was a break in the clouds tonight.  I had 12&#215;60 binoculars and a view of Perseus from the city &#8212; but I could not see the comet.</p>

	<p><img src="http://theparagraph.com/wp-content/articles/post133/perseusMap3.png" alt="" /><br />
The blue disk marks Comet Holmes.  The circles mark the left-end of the &#8220;W&#8221; and the Pleiades.  The nearest bright star to the comet is Mirfak, the brightest in Perseus. <a href="http://www.fourmilab.ch/cgi-bin/Yourtel?lat=44.6831&amp;ns=North&amp;lon=47.108&amp;fov=60.000&amp;date=1&amp;utc=2007%2D12%2D06+5%3A06%3A24&amp;jd=2454440%2E71278&amp;coords=on&amp;deepm=6%2E5&amp;consto=on&amp;constn=on&amp;limag=4%2E0&amp;starn=on&amp;starnm=2%2E5&amp;starbm=4%2E0&amp;showmb=%2D1%2E5&amp;showmd=6%2E0&amp;imgsize=512&amp;scheme=0"><em>map</em></a> <em>elements program by John Walker</em></p>

	<p><img src="http://theparagraph.com/wp-content/articles/post133/750px-17P_Holmes_2007_11_29_detail.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:17P_Holmes_2007_11_29_detail.jpg">2007-11-29, Marshall Twp., Pennsylvania</a></p>

	<h3>Sources</h3>

	<p id="fn14563281154c5231d81deb8" class="footnote"><sup>50</sup> <a href="http://www.skyandtelescope.com/observing/home/10775326.html">&#8216;Comet Holmes Beckons Skygazers Worldwide&#8217; &#8211; Alan MacRobert, Sky &amp; Telescope</a></p>

	<p id="fn20609070384c5231d81df03" class="footnote"><sup>51</sup> <a href="http://www.space.com/spacewatch/071023-comet-holmes-update.html">&#8216;Rare Event: Easy-to-See Comet Holmes&#8217; By Joe Rao, <span class="caps">SPACE</span>.com Skywatching Columnist posted: 30 October 2007</a></p>

 * * *
<a href="http://theparagraph.com/?page_id=20#Copyright">By Quinn Hungeski</a> &#8211; Posted at <a href="http://hungeski.gnn.tv">G.N.N.</a> &amp; <a href="http://theparagraph.com">TheParagraph.com</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theparagraph.com/2007/12/comet-holmes-still-visible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Phantom Galaxy Picture from Hubble Telescope</title>
		<link>http://theparagraph.com/2007/11/hubble-telescope-gives-new-picture-of-the-phantom-galaxy/</link>
		<comments>http://theparagraph.com/2007/11/hubble-telescope-gives-new-picture-of-the-phantom-galaxy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 04:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Quinn Hungeski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galaxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M74]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milky Way]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phantom Galaxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pisces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spiral galaxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telescope]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theparagraph.com/2007/11/hubble-telescope-gives-new-picture-of-the-phantom-galaxy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	2007-11-30: Yesterday NASA and the European Space Agency released a nice picture of galaxy M74 composed from data taken by the Hubble Space Telescope in 2003 &#38; 2005.x40  The galaxy is in Pisces, about 32 million light years away, and is a spiral galaxy like our Milky Way, but a bit smaller.  A [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>2007-11-30: Yesterday <span class="caps">NASA</span> and the European Space Agency released a nice picture of galaxy M74 composed from data taken by the Hubble Space Telescope in 2003 &amp; 2005.x<sup class="footnote"><a href="#fn18996056484c5231d83145f">40</a></sup>  The galaxy is in Pisces, about 32 million light years away, and is a spiral galaxy like our Milky Way, but a bit smaller.  A French astronomer, Pierre Mechain, found the galaxy in 1780.  Being faint (10th magnitude) and hard to see from a backyard telescope, M74 came to be called the &#8220;Phantom Galaxy&#8221;.</p>

	<p><img src="http://theparagraph.com/wp-content/articles/post132/m74_scihubble129.jpg" alt="" /><br />
_M74, The Phantom Galaxy &#8211; <span class="caps">NASA</span>, <span class="caps">ESA</span>, and the <a href="http://heritage.stsci.edu/2007/41/fast_facts.html">Hubble Heritage (STScI/AURA)-<span class="caps">ESA</span>/Hubble Collaboration_</a></p>

	<p>Being inside of it, we can&#8217;t take a picture of the whole Milky Way.  But we can make a picture of it from our inside views, including those of space telescopes.x<sup class="footnote"><a href="#fn2627235214c5231d831a8e">41</a></sup>  Unlike M74, the Milky Way has a distinct central bar of stars.</p>

	<p><img src="http://theparagraph.com/wp-content/articles/post132/milkyway_sig05-010_small.jpg" alt="" /><br />
_The Milky Way &#8211; <a href="http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/Media/mediaimages/sig/sig05-010.shtml"><span class="caps">NASA</span>/JPL-Caltech/R. Hurt (<span class="caps">SSC</span>)_</a></p>

	<p><a href="http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/"><strong><span class="caps">APOD</span></strong></a> (Astronomy Picture of the Day)</p>

	<h3>Sources</h3>

	<p id="fn18996056484c5231d83145f" class="footnote"><sup>40</sup> <a href="http://heritage.stsci.edu/2007/41/caption.html">&#8216;Holiday Wishes from the Hubble Space Telescope&#8217; &#8211; The Hubble Heritage Project</a></p>

	<p id="fn2627235214c5231d831a8e" class="footnote"><sup>41</sup> <a href="http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/Media/mediaimages/sig/sig05-010.shtml">&#8216;Milky Way Bar&#8217; &#8211; Spitzer Space Telescope, <span class="caps">NASA</span></a></p>

 * * *
<a href="http://theparagraph.com/?page_id=20#Copyright">By Quinn Hungeski</a> &#8211; Posted at <a href="http://hungeski.gnn.tv">G.N.N.</a> &amp; <a href="http://theparagraph.com">TheParagraph.com</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theparagraph.com/2007/11/hubble-telescope-gives-new-picture-of-the-phantom-galaxy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First-Ever Double Helix Nebula Found in Central Milky Way</title>
		<link>http://theparagraph.com/2006/03/first-ever-double-helix-nebula-found-in-central-milky-way/</link>
		<comments>http://theparagraph.com/2006/03/first-ever-double-helix-nebula-found-in-central-milky-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 20:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Quinn Hungeski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GNN Top Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theparagraph.com/?p=74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Last week astronomers published the discovery of something never seen before &#8211; a double helix nebula, which they found near the center of the Milky Way1.  Astronomers took a picture of the nebula (shown below) using the Spitzer infrared space telescope, one of NASA&#8217;s four &#8220;great observatories&#8221;, each of which detects a different radiation [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Last week astronomers published the discovery of something never seen before &#8211; a double helix nebula, which they found near the center of the Milky Way<sup class="footnote"><a href="#fn5464136784c5231d8519f9">1</a></sup>.  Astronomers took a picture of the nebula (shown below) using the Spitzer infrared space telescope, one of <span class="caps">NASA</span>&#8217;s four &#8220;great observatories&#8221;, each of which detects a different radiation band<sup class="footnote"><a href="#fn11169166754c5231d851a43">2</a></sup>.  The picture covers about 80 light years of the nebula&#8217;s length and shows the two intertwined strands of space dust and gas forming the double helix, which is also the shape of <span class="caps">DNA</span> molecules.  The report&#8217;s lead astronomer thinks that a magnetic field sent out vertically from the large disk of gas circling the galaxy&#8217;s central black hole has shaped the nebula.  The nebula lies about 300 light years from the central black hole.  By comparison, the Earth lies more than 25,000 light years from the central black hole.  Unlike visible light, infrared rays beam clearly past the dense dust at the galaxy&#8217;s center to reach our space telescope<sup class="footnote"><a href="#fn7865177014c5231d851a8b">3</a></sup>.</p>

	<p><img src="http://theparagraph.com/wp-content/articles/post74//nr_6903a.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<em>The double helix nebula. (The image uses false colors because the eye is not sensitive to infrared light.) The spots are infrared-luminous stars, mostly red giants and red supergiants. Many other stars are present in this region, but are too dim to appear even in this sensitive infrared image.  Credit: <span class="caps">NASA</span>/JPL-Caltech/UCLA</em></p>

	<h3>Sources</h3>

	<p id="fn5464136784c5231d8519f9" class="footnote"><sup>1</sup> <a href="http://www.newsroom.ucla.edu/page.asp?RelNum=6903">&#8216;Astronomers Report Unprecedented Double Helix Nebula Near Center of the Milky Way&#8217; &#8211; <span class="caps">UCLA</span> News, March 15, 2006</a></p>

	<p id="fn11169166754c5231d851a43" class="footnote"><sup>2</sup> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Observatories">Great Observatories program&#8217; &#8211; Wikipedia</a></p>

	<blockquote>
		<p>Spitzer is quite difficult or impossible to replicate with ground telescopes, and had few orbiting predecessors. Spitzer was not an order of magnitude larger than its latest predecessor, <span class="caps">ISO</span> (the Infrared Space Observatory). However, Spitzer&#8217;s instruments took advantage of the rapid advances in infrared detector technology at the time. Combined with its slightly larger aperture, favorable fields of view, and longer life, science return will be unprecedented. Infrared observations are useful for cool objects which do not emit much visible light, or objects obscured by dust at visible light wavelengths.</p>
	</blockquote>

	<p id="fn7865177014c5231d851a8b" class="footnote"><sup>3</sup> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Observatories#Synergies">Great Observatories program, Synergies&#8217; &#8211; Wikipedia</a></p>

	<blockquote>
		<p>The ability of Spitzer to see though dust and thick gases is good for galactic nuclei observations. Massive objects at the hearts of galaxies shine in X-rays, gamma rays, and radio waves, but infrared studies into these clouded regions can reveal the number and positions of objects.</p>
	</blockquote>

	<p id="fn4" class="footnote"><sup>4</sup> <a href="http://arxiv.org/ftp/astro-ph/papers/0512/0512452.pdf" title="pdf">&#8216;The Double Helix Nebula: a magnetic torsional wave propagating out of the Galactic centre&#8217; &#8211; Mark Morris, Keven Uchida, and Tuan Do</a></p>

	<blockquote>
		<p>Comments: Accepted for publication in Nature. 13 pages, 3 figures. Includes supplementary material</p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p>Radioastronomical studies have indicated that the magnetic field in the central few hundred parsecs of our Milky Way Galaxy has a dipolar geometry and a strength substantially larger than elsewhere in the Galaxy, with estimates ranging up to a milligauss. A strong, large-scale magnetic field can affect the Galactic orbits of molecular clouds by exerting a drag on them, it can inhibit star formation, and it can guide a wind of cosmic rays away from the central region, so a characterization of the magnetic field at the Galactic center is important for understanding much of the activity there. Here, we report Spitzer Space Telescope observations of an unprecedented infrared nebula having the morphology of an intertwined double helix. This feature is located about 100 pc from the Galaxy&#8217;s dynamical centre toward positive Galactic latitude, and its axis is oriented perpendicular to the Galactic plane. The observed segment is about 25 pc in length, and contains about 1.25 full turns of each of the two continuous, helically wound strands. We interpret this feature as a torsional Alfven wave propagating vertically away from the Galactic disk, driven by rotation of the magnetized circumnuclear gas disk. As such, it offers a new morphological probe of the Galactic center magnetic field. The direct connection between the circumnuclear disk and the double helix is ambiguous, but the <span class="caps">MSX</span> images show a possible meandering channel that warrants further investigation. </p>
	</blockquote>

 * * *
<a href="http://theparagraph.com/?page_id=20#Copyright">By Quinn Hungeski</a> &#8211; Posted at <a href="http://hungeski.gnn.tv">G.N.N.</a> &amp; <a href="http://theparagraph.com">TheParagraph.com</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theparagraph.com/2006/03/first-ever-double-helix-nebula-found-in-central-milky-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Towards the Center of the Milky Way</title>
		<link>http://theparagraph.com/2006/03/towards-the-center-of-the-milky-way/</link>
		<comments>http://theparagraph.com/2006/03/towards-the-center-of-the-milky-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Quinn Hungeski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theparagraph.com/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	In 1783 Rev. John Mitchell put forth the idea of a dark star, one with such gravity that light could not escape it1.  But after Thomas Young showed that light acts as a wave, rather than particles, the idea lay dormant for more than a century.  In 1916, on the heels of Albert [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>In 1783 Rev. John Mitchell put forth the idea of a dark star, one with such gravity that light could not escape it<sup class="footnote"><a href="#fn3452788784c5231d899609">1</a></sup>.  But after Thomas Young showed that light acts as a wave, rather than particles, the idea lay dormant for more than a century.  In 1916, on the heels of Albert Einstein&#8217;s general theory of relativity, Karl Schwarzschild mathematically described space and time around a spherical mass, and calculated the &#8220;event horizon&#8221;, the radius inside which light could not escape<sup class="footnote"><a href="#fn7649429764c5231d899653">2</a></sup>.  In the 1930&#8217;s, Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar calculated the mass (1.4 suns) at which a spent star must crunch into a neutron star, and J.R. Oppenheimer calculated the mass (3.2 suns) at which a spent star must crunch into a dark star<sup class="footnote"><a href="#fn16135428954c5231d89969b">3</a></sup>, which in the late 1960&#8217;s came to be called a &#8220;black hole<sup class="footnote"><a href="#fn5283167944c5231d8996e2">15</a></sup>&#8220;.</p>

	<p>In 1972 <span class="caps">NASA</span> launched Uhuru, the first satellite x-ray observatory, from off the coast of Kenya.  Uhuru tracked x-rays coming from Cygnus X-1, one star of a binary star system<sup class="footnote"><a href="#fn8697671734c5231d89c69e">4</a></sup>.  X-rays shoot from a dense, crunched star as it pulls and heats matter from its companion star.  The fast flicker of the x-rays and the wobble in the spectral picture of the companion star showed that Cygnus X-1 has extremely small size and large mass, and made it our first black hole candidate<sup class="footnote"><a href="#fn14154710674c5231d89c6e7">5</a></sup>.</p>

	<p>In 1937, in suburban Chicago, Grote Reber used his homemade backyard radio telescope to identify a strong source of radio waves in Cygnus<sup class="footnote"><a href="#fn14698054254c5231d89ccbb">16</a></sup>.  In 1951 Walter Baade focused the big Palomar telescope on the radio source in Cygnus A to take spectral pictures.  The pictures showed emission lines indicating very high energy and a red-shift indicating very great distance &#8211; to another galaxy<sup class="footnote"><a href="#fn7796371644c5231d89cd04">14</a></sup>.  Further radio wave observations showed opposing plumes of particles from Cygnus A several times larger than the galaxy itself.  In 1961 Fred Hoyle and William Fowler proposed that such radio galaxies were due to collapse of the mass of ten million to a hundred million suns, and by the late 1960&#8217;s the idea of super-massive black holes at galactic cores took hold<sup class="footnote"><a href="#fn7010299814c5231d89cd4c">7</a></sup>.  In 1974 scientists at the main National Radio Astronomy Observatory facility, in Green Bank, West Virginia, detected a strong radio source, which they named Sagittarius A* (pronounced &#8220;A-star&#8221;), at the center of the Milky Way<sup class="footnote"><a href="#fn12592952874c5231d89cd93">6</a></sup>.</p>

	<p>In 1990 <span class="caps">NASA</span> sent space shuttle Discovery to launch the Hubble telescope, the first of its four &#8220;great observatories&#8221;, each detecting a different radiation band &#8211; infra-red, visible light, x-rays and gamma rays.  In 1994 Hubble, the visible light observatory, found a spiral-shaped disk of hot gas revolving rapidly around the core of the M87 galaxy, just as material would revolve around a super-massive black hole<sup class="footnote"><a href="#fn15557942734c5231d8a68db">8</a></sup>.  In 1999, space shuttle Columbia astronauts launched the Chandra x-ray observatory (named after Chandrasekhar).  Chandra soon detected x-rays from the center of the Milky Way, giving further evidence that Sagittarius A* is a super-massive black hole<sup class="footnote"><a href="#fn790601454c5231d8a6924">9</a></sup>.  </p>

	<p>In 2002, the European Southern Observatory announced the result of ten years of observation of stars near the center of the Milky Way.  One star, S2, was found to sling around Sagittarius A* in a close, fifteen-year orbit &#8211; the tight orbit that a star would have around a super-massive black hole<sup class="footnote"><a href="#fn12780420674c5231d8a6ee5">10</a></sup>.  In November 2005, using the National Science Foundation&#8217;s Very Large Baseline Array of synchronized radio telescopes spread across the continent, scientists showed the closest picture yet of Sagittarius A*x<sup class="footnote"><a href="#fn9419444764c5231d8a6f2e">11</a></sup>.  Science agencies in Europe and North America are now building a larger and more detailed radio telescope array, the Atacama Large Millimeter Array (<span class="caps">ALMA</span>).  With <span class="caps">ALMA</span> we may see right up to the event horizon, the very &#8220;shadow&#8221; of the Milky Way&#8217;s central black hole<sup class="footnote"><a href="#fn20347131844c5231d8a6f76">12</a></sup>x<sup class="footnote"><a href="#fn11189728034c5231d8a6fbc">13</a></sup>.</p>

	<p><img src="http://theparagraph.com/wp-content/articles/post73/grote_telescope-sm.jpg" alt="" /><br />
Grote Reber&#8217;s homemade backyard radio telescope (Photo: <span class="caps">NRAO</span>)</p>

	<p><img src="http://theparagraph.com/wp-content/articles/post73/cygnusA_3C405.jpg" alt="" /><br />
Cygnus A galaxy radio jets &amp; plumes, <span class="caps">VLA</span> radio image.</p>

	<p><img src="http://theparagraph.com/wp-content/articles/post73/sgra_med.jpg" alt="" /><br />
The center of the Milky Way, Chandra x-ray image.<br />
Credit: X-ray: <span class="caps">NASA</span>/CXC/MIT/F.K.Baganoff et al.; Illustration: <span class="caps">NASA</span>/CXC/M.Weiss</p>

	<p><img src="http://theparagraph.com/wp-content/articles/post73/sgraW1ly.small.jpg" alt="" /><br />
The center of the Milky Way, <span class="caps">VLA</span> radio image.<br />
Sagittarius A* is the bright white dot at center.<br />
<span class="caps">CREDIT</span>: <span class="caps">NRAO</span>/AUI/NSF, Jun-Hui Zhao, W.M. Goss</p>

	<p><img src="http://theparagraph.com/wp-content/articles/post73/SgrCleveland0921_2100edt.jpg" alt="" /><br />
Sagittarius, Cleveland, Sept. 21, 9:00pm edt</p>

	<h3>Electromagnetic Radiation Spectrum</h3>

	<p><em>short waves, high frequency</em><br />
Gamma Rays<br />
X-Rays<br />
Ultra-violet<br />
Visible<br />
Infra-red<br />
Microwave<br />
Radio<br />
<em>long waves, low frequency</em></p>

	<p>Note: wavelength x frequency = speed of light</p>

	<h3>Star Life Cycles</h3>

	<table>
		<tr>
			<td><strong>Phase</strong></td>
			<td><strong>Description</strong></td>
			<td><strong>Medium Mass</strong></td>
			<td><strong>HighMass</strong></td>
			<td><strong>Highest Mass</strong></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Burn</td>
			<td>Fuses hydrogen to helium to carbon.</td>
			<td>main sequence star</td>
			<td>main sequence star</td>
			<td>main sequence star</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Puff</td>
			<td>Shell expands.</td>
			<td>red giant</td>
			<td>red supergiant</td>
			<td>red supergiant</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Blast</td>
			<td>Fuses to iron and explodes.</td>
			<td>-</td>
			<td>supernova</td>
			<td>supernova</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Crunch</td>
			<td>Core collapses.</td>
			<td>white dwarf</td>
			<td>neutron star</td>
			<td>black hole</td>
		</tr>
	</table>

	<h3>Sources</h3>

	<p id="fn3452788784c5231d899609" class="footnote"><sup>1</sup> <a href="http://library.thinkquest.org/25715/discovery/conceiving.htm#darkstars">&#8216;Dark Stars (1783)&#8217; &#8211; Thinkquest.org</a></p>

	<blockquote>
		<p>    The concept of black holes was first introduced over two centuries ago. In 1783, Reverend John Mitchell, an amateur British astronomer, proposed that gravity could affect light as well as matter. Mitchell showed that an object with the density of the sun, yet five hundred times larger would exert a gravitational pull so great that  &#8220;all light emitted from such a body would be made to return toward it.&#8221; </p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p>   In 1795, Pierre-Simon Laplace, a French physicist who independently reached the same conclusions, reasoned that: &#8220;it is therefore possible that the greatest luminous bodies in the universe are on this account invisible.&#8221;</p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p>   Both Mitchell and Laplace believed that the escape velocity, the speed necessary to escape the star&#8217;s gravity, for a sufficently large star would be greater than the speed of light. Because light could not escape from the gravitational pull, the dark star would appear invisible to an observer against the night sky. Both theories were based on Newton&#8217;s theory of gravitation and corpuscular light.</p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p>   For many years afterward, the idea of an object with enough gravity to keep itself invisible was discarded by many scientists because in 1799 Thomas Young demonstrated that light acted as a wave. It would take another century before the idea of  black holes would come back into the light.  </p>
	</blockquote>

	<p id="fn7649429764c5231d899653" class="footnote"><sup>2</sup> <a href="http://library.thinkquest.org/25715/discovery/conceiving.htm#schwarzschild">&#8216;Schwarzschild&#8217;s Solution (1916)&#8217; &#8211; Thinkquest.org</a></p>

	<blockquote>
		<p>The modern concept of the black hole was introduced in 1916. Briefly following the release of Einstein&#8217;s General Relativity, Karl Schwarzschild, a German physicist, discovered a mathematical solution to Einstein&#8217;s field equations that described the gravitational field of a point mass while fighting for the German army in World War I. Schwarzschild died several months later from a rare disease contracted during the war.</p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p>This solution, known as Schwarzschild Geometry, describes the space and time around any spherical mass including the distance from the center of a sphere at which light cannot escape. This distance is known as the Schwarzschild Radius (rs). If the mass of an object is entirely inside the Schwarzschild Radius, we have a perfectly spherical, non-rotating black hole. </p>
	</blockquote>

	<p id="fn16135428954c5231d89969b" class="footnote"><sup>3</sup> <a href="http://library.thinkquest.org/25715/discovery/conceiving.htm#limits">&#8216;Limits of Gravity (1930-1939)&#8217; &#8211; Thinkquest.org</a></p>

	<blockquote>
		<p>For some time, black holes would remain only an incarnation of relativity. How could such an object actually exist in nature? The answer lies in the death of a star.</p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p>In 1930,  Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar, an Indian physicist, calculated the mass limit  (1.4 solar masses) of a star by which its gravitational collapse would be prevented by the exclusion principle for electrons and become a white dwarf.  A white dwarf with mass greater than this limit is unable to support itself against its own gravitational pull and crunches into a neutron star.</p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p>In 1939, J.R. Oppenheimer, an American scientist, calculated that maximum mass limit of a neutron star is about 3.2 solar masses. Oppenheimer proposed that in a star with mass over this limit, gravity would be unopposed and the star would become a black hole. Oppenheimer would later abandon his work on black holes to help build the atomic bomb during World War 2.</p>
	</blockquote>

	<p id="fn8697671734c5231d89c69e" class="footnote"><sup>4</sup> <a href="http://chandra.harvard.edu/chronicle/0202/40years/index.html">&#8216;Major Milestones In X-ray Astronomy&#8217; by <span class="caps">WKT</span></a></p>

	<blockquote>
		<p>Date: December 1970 to March 1973<br />
Vehicle/Mission: Uhuru X-ray satellite<br />
Agency/Country: <span class="caps">NASA</span><br />
Instruments/Detectors: Proportional counters (2 -20 keV)<br />
Mirror Description: No mirrors<br />
Highlights: Uhuru, the first satellite dedicated to the observation of cosmic X-ray sources, was equipped with a sensitive proportional counter attached to a viewing pipe to locate the sources. It expanded the number of known sources to more than 400, showed that X-ray stars are neutron stars or black holes accreting matter from companions in binary star systems, and discovered X-rays from hot gas in galaxy clusters.</p>
	</blockquote>

	<p id="fn14154710674c5231d89c6e7" class="footnote"><sup>5</sup> <a href="http://library.thinkquest.org/25715/discovery/binary.htm#cygnusx1">&#8216;Cygnus X-1 (A Black Hole)&#8217; &#8211; Thinkquest.org</a></p>

	<blockquote>
		<p>In 1972, an invisible X-ray source from the constellation Cygnus was first detected by X-ray observatory Uhuru (Swahili for &#8220;freedom&#8221;) and named Cygnus X-1. The  X-ray source was found to orbit every 5.6 days around its companion <span class="caps">HDE</span> 226868, a blue supergiant with 30 solar masses.</p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p>Why was Cygnus X-1 considered a black hole? For starters, Cygnus X-1 flickers at less than a thousandth of a second bursts. For an object to flicker, light must travel all the way across its surface. So if light travels 300 kilometers per thousandth of a second, that must mean that Cygnus X-1 is much smaller than our planet. </p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p>Second, <span class="caps">HDE</span> 226868&#8217;s spectral lines wobble because of the gravitational pull of Cygnus X-1. In order for that to be possible, scientists estimate that Cygnus X-1 must have at least 7 or more solar masses, putting its mass way beyond the Oppenheimer-Volkoff Limit for a neutron star.  </p>
	</blockquote>

	<p id="fn12592952874c5231d89cd93" class="footnote"><sup>6</sup> <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/04/040402073004.htm">Radio Astronomers Lift &#8216;Fog&#8217; On Milky Way&#8217;s Dark Heart; Black Hole Fits Inside Earth&#8217;s Orbit &#8211; <em>Science Daily</em>, April 2, 2004</a></p>

	<blockquote>
		<p>Sagittarius A* was discovered in February of 1974 by Bruce Balick, now at the University of Washington, and Robert Brown, now director of the National Astronomy and Ionospheric Center at Cornell University. It has been shown conclusively to be the center of the Milky Way, around which the rest of the Galaxy rotates.</p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p>&#8230;</p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p>In March 2004, 55 astronomers gathered at the National Radio Astronomy Observatory facility in Green Bank, West Virginia, for a scientific conference celebrating the discovery of Sagittarius A* at Green Bank 30 years ago. At this conference, the scientists unveiled a commemorative plaque on one of the discovery telescopes.</p>
	</blockquote>

	<p id="fn7010299814c5231d89cd4c" class="footnote"><sup>7</sup> <a href="http://www.maths.soton.ac.uk/applied/GR-Explorer/bh/blackhole.htm">&#8216; Giants in the galaxy cores&#8217; &#8211; Southampton General Relativity Explorer</a></p>

	<blockquote>
		<p> An outstanding example is M87, a strong radio source that has been identified with an elliptical galaxy about 50 million light years away. Matter is ejected at relativistic speed from the centre of this galaxy in two gigantic jets that extend for 2600 light years from the core. The energy radiated through the jets is equivalent to that released in something like 10 million supernova explosions! What central engine could lead to the release of such awesome power? The explanation that caught on was the idea that the <span class="caps">AGN</span>s are the manifestation of gigantic black holes located at the heart of distant galaxies. In a paper that appeared in Nature on March 16 1961, Hoyle and Fowler suggested that the radiated energy ought to signal the collapse of some kind of superstar.</p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p><em>Our present opinion is that only through the contraction of a mass of 10-100 million solar-masses to the relativity limit can the energies of the strongest sources be obtained.</em> (Hoyle and Fowler 1961)</p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p>This was an intriguing proposal, but it was difficult to see how collapse could be the explanation for the observed jets. The gravitational collapse of even such an enormous congregation of matter would only last a day or so, but the jets were evidence of ongoing emission for more than a million years! Whatever the central object was, it must be able to radiate continually for a very long time. Realizing this, Ya B Zeldovich and Igor Novikov envisaged a model based on a some kind of supermassive compact object powered by accretion. They argued that the mass of such an object must be of the order of 100 million solar masses if the luminosity is to be smaller that the Eddington limit (at which radiation pressure balances the pull of gravitation and thus prevents further accretion). Within this model even the strongest observed sources could be fuelled by accretion of just a few solar masses worth of material per year. The idea seemed plausible and a few years later (in 1969) Donald Lynden-Bell suggested that the central object in an active galaxy is a supermassive black hole feeding off of an accretion disk. </p>
	</blockquote>

	<p id="fn15557942734c5231d8a68db" class="footnote"><sup>8</sup> <a href="http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/newsdesk/archive/releases/1994/23/">&#8216;Hubble Confirms Existence of Massive Black Hole at Heart of Active Galaxy&#8217; &#8211; Hubblesite.org</a> </p>

	<blockquote>
		<p>Astronomers using the Hubble telescope have found seemingly conclusive evidence for a massive black hole in the center of the giant elliptical galaxy M87, located 50 million light-years from Earth in the constellation Virgo. Earlier observations suggested that the black hole was present, but they were not decisive.</p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p>This observation provides very strong support for the existence of gravitationally collapsed objects, which were predicted 80 years ago by Albert Einstein&#8217;s general theory of relativity. This image shows a spiral-shaped disk of hot gas in the core of M87. Hubble measurements indicate that the disk&#8217;s rapid rotation is strong evidence that it contains a massive black hole. A black hole is so massive and compact that nothing can escape its gravitational pull, not even light.</p>
	</blockquote>

	<p id="fn790601454c5231d8a6924" class="footnote"><sup>9</sup> <a href="http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2000/ast29feb_1m.htm">&#8216;A Monster in the Middle&#8217; &#8211; <span class="caps">NASA</span></a></p>

	<blockquote>
		<p>If Sag A* really does harbor a black hole, it ought to shine as an X-ray source. The X-rays would come from hot gas in an accretion disk swirling into the dense gravitational field of the hole. Previous X-ray satellites lacked the combined resolution and sensitivity to make this basic test. But now, thanks to the Chandra X-ray Observatory, astronomers finally have the data they&#8217;ve been waiting for.</p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p>A group of researchers led by Frederick K. Baganoff and colleagues from Pennsylvania State University announced last month that a faint X-ray source, newly detected by Chandra, may be the long-sought X-ray emission from a supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way.</p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p>&#8220;The race to be the first to detect X-rays from Sagittarius A* is one of the hottest and longest running in all of X-ray astronomy,&#8221; Baganoff said. &#8220;Theorists are eager to hear the results of our observation so they can test their ideas.&#8221;</p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p>Chandra&#8217;s remarkable detection of this X-ray source has placed astronomers within a couple of years of a coveted prize: measuring the spectrum of energy produced by Sagittarius A* to determine in detail how the supermassive black hole that powers it works.</p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p>As the high energy X rays stream away from the vicinity of the black hole, they heat the blanketing gas to temperatures of a few million degrees, and the blanket absorbs some of the X rays from the central source. This produces dark stripes, or absorption lines in the X-ray spectrum. Bright stripes or emission lines due to emission from the blanketing gas are also present. Since each element has its own unique structure, these lines can be read like a cosmic bar code to take inventory of the gas. The team was able to determine what atoms the gas contains and how many, the number of electrons each atom has retained in the hostile environment of the black hole, and how the gas is moving there. They found lines from eight different elements including carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and iron. The amount of this gas was found to be about 100 times greater than that found with optical and ultraviolet observations. </p>
	</blockquote>

	<p id="fn12780420674c5231d8a6ee5" class="footnote"><sup>10</sup> <a href="http://www.eso.org/outreach/press-rel/pr-2002/pr-17-02.html">&#8216;Star Orbiting Massive Milky Way Centre Approaches to within 17 Light-Hours&#8217; &#8211; European Southern Observatory</a></p>

	<blockquote>
		<p> No event like this one has ever been recorded . These unique data show unambiguously that S2 is moving along an elliptical orbit with SgrA* at one focus, i.e. S2 orbits SgrA* like the Earth orbits the Sun, cf. the right panel of PR Photo 23c/02 .</p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p>The superb data also allow a precise determination of the orbital parameters (shape, size, etc.). It turns out that S2 reached its closest distance to SgrA* in the spring of 2002, at which moment it was only 17 light-hours &lt;5&gt; away from the radio source, or just 3 times the Sun-Pluto distance. It was then moving at more than 5000 km/s, or nearly two hundred times the speed of the Earth in its orbit around the Sun. The orbital period is 15.2 years. The orbit is rather elongated &#8211; the eccentricity is 0.87 &#8211; indicating that S2 is about 10 light-days away from the central mass at the most distant orbital point &lt;7&gt;.</p>
	</blockquote>

	<p id="fn9419444764c5231d8a6f2e" class="footnote"><sup>11</sup> <a href="http://www.nrao.edu/pr/2005/sagastar/">&#8216;Astronomers Get Closest Look Yet At Milky Way&#8217;s Mysterious Core&#8217; &#8211; National Radio Astronomy Observatory</a></p>

	<blockquote>
		<p>The astronomers used the <span class="caps">VLBA</span> to measure the size of an object called Sagittarius A* (pronounced &#8220;A-star&#8221;) that marks the exact center of our Galaxy. Last year, a different team announced that their measurements showed the object would fit inside the complete circle of Earth&#8217;s orbit around the Sun. Shen and his team, by observing at a higher radio frequency, measured Sagittarius A* as half that size.</p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p>A mass equal to four million Suns is known to lie within Sagittarius A*, and the new measurement makes the case for a black hole even more compelling than it was previously. Scientists simply don&#8217;t know of any long-lasting object other than a black hole that could contain this much mass in such a small area. However, they would like to see even stronger proof of a black hole.</p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p>&#8230;</p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p>In a few years, when the Atacama Large Millimeter Array (<span class="caps">ALMA</span>) comes on line, it may be used in conjunction with other millimeter-wave telescopes to make the higher-frequency observations that will reveal the telltale black-hole shadow.</p>
	</blockquote>

	<p id="fn20347131844c5231d8a6f76" class="footnote"><sup>12</sup> <a href="http://www.alma.info/"><span class="caps">ALMA</span> Partners</a></p>

	<blockquote>
		<p>The Atacama Large Millimeter Array (<span class="caps">ALMA</span>) is an international astronomy facility. <span class="caps">ALMA</span> is an equal partnership between Europe and North America, in cooperation with the Republic of Chile, and is funded in North America by the U.S. National Science Foundation (<span class="caps">NSF</span>) in cooperation with the National Research Council of Canada (<span class="caps">NRC</span>), and in Europe by the European Southern Observatory (<span class="caps">ESO</span>) and Spain. <span class="caps">ALMA</span> construction and operations are led on behalf of North America by the National Radio Astronomy Observatory (<span class="caps">NRAO</span>), which is managed by Associated Universities, Inc. (<span class="caps">AUI</span>), and on behalf of Europe by <span class="caps">ESO</span>.</p>
	</blockquote>

	<p id="fn11189728034c5231d8a6fbc" class="footnote"><sup>13</sup> <a href="http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/051011_blackhole_shadow.html">&#8216;A Quest to See a Black Hole&#8217;s Shadow&#8217; &#8211; Space.com</a></p>

	<blockquote>
		<p>Astronomers have already detected radiation from hot spots just outside the black hole, and they believe that these will paint a background against which the black hole&#8217;s profile, or shadow, will stand out.</p>
	</blockquote>

	<p id="fn7796371644c5231d89cd04" class="footnote"><sup>14</sup> <a href="http://chandra.harvard.edu/chronicle/0101/cyga2.html">&#8216;Cygnus A, Quasars, and Quandaries&#8217; &#8211; The Chandra Chronicles, March 13, 2001</a></p>

	<blockquote>
		<p>When Walter Baade and Rudolph Minkowski obtained the spectrum of Cygnus A, they found what they considered to be proof of colliding galaxies: emission lines that indicated they were produced by gas in a high state of excitation. </p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p>&#8230;</p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p>The spectrum also showed that the emission lines were all red-shifted by the same amount. This in itself was not unexpected, since two decades earlier Edwin Hubble and his colleagues had shown that the spectra of distant galaxies would show a red-shift proportional to their distance. The difficulty was that the measured red-shift implied that Cygnus A was very distant &#8212; possibly 1 billion light years distant!</p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p>&#8230;</p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p> It has the shape of a great cosmic dumbbell, with two huge lobes of high-energy particles located over half a million light years apart. The galaxy, which is several times smaller than the lobes, is located in the middle. It was beginning to look as if the radiation from Cygnus A was not due to galaxies in collision, but to some mysterious explosive process where high-energy particles were being blown out of the galaxy!</p>
	</blockquote>

	<p id="fn5283167944c5231d8996e2" class="footnote"><sup>15</sup> <a href="http://www.firstscience.com/site/articles/blackholes.asp">&#8216;Black Holes and Time Machines&#8217; By Sir Martin Rees, Astronomer Royal</a></p>

	<blockquote>
		<p>The term &#8216;black hole&#8217; itself was not coined until 1968, when John Wheeler described how an infalling object &#8216;becomes dimmer millisecond by millisecond&hellip;light and particles incident from outside &hellip;go down the black hole only to add to its mass and increase its gravitational attraction.&#8217;</p>
	</blockquote>

	<p id="fn14698054254c5231d89ccbb" class="footnote"><sup>16</sup> <a href="http://chandra.harvard.edu/chronicle/0101/cyga1.html">&#8216;The Discovery of Cygnus A&#8217; &#8211; The Chandra Chronicles, January 31, 2001</a></p>

	<blockquote>
		<p>In 1946, many engineers and scientists in the United Kingdom and Australia used the talents and technology acquired during World War II to explore the sky with radio telescopes. They were especially interested in a region in the constellation Cygnus which had been identified as a strong source of radio waves by radio astronomy pioneer Grote Reber, who had used a $2,000 homemade radio telescope in his back yard in Wheaton, Illinois to make a radio map of the Milky Way.</p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p>&#8230;</p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p>Francis Graham Smith used an improved radio telescope in Cambridge, England to get a much more accurate position of Cygnus A. Smith airmailed his results at once to Walter Baade at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena. Within a few weeks, Baade was in the observing cage of the 200 inch telescope on Palomar Mountain. He focused the powerful telescope on the position given by Smith, and took two photographs, one in blue and one in yellow light. The next afternoon, he developed the photographs.</p>
	</blockquote>

	<blockquote>
		<p>&#8220;I knew something was unusual the moment I examined the negatives,&#8221; Baade recalled. &#8220;There were galaxies all over the plate, more than two hundred of them, and the brightest was at the center. It showed signs of tidal distortion, gravitational pull between the two nuclei &#8212; I had never seen anything like it before.</p>
	</blockquote>

 * * *
<a href="http://theparagraph.com/?page_id=20#Copyright">By Quinn Hungeski</a> &#8211; Posted at <a href="http://hungeski.gnn.tv">G.N.N.</a> &amp; <a href="http://theparagraph.com">TheParagraph.com</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theparagraph.com/2006/03/towards-the-center-of-the-milky-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
